The ongoing federal case surrounding Sean “Diddy” Combs has reached a critical point, and prosecutors are making it clear they want his recent convictions to stand.
With the trial now moving into the sentencing phase, the government filed a motion urging the court to reject Diddy’s request for acquittal or a new trial, underscoring the weight of the evidence presented.
Diddy’s defense team argued that his Mann Act conviction was both unusual and unwarranted. Prosecutors disagreed, pointing to testimony that detailed so-called “freak-offs” and “hotel nights,” alleging Diddy used recorded encounters to maintain control over his partners. “Evidence during the trial firmly supported the jury’s convictions,” prosecutors stated, as they outlined how Diddy allegedly influenced multiple aspects of personal and professional life for those around him. They claimed he managed details of Ventura’s career, her image, and her lifestyle, including covering her expenses. At one point, prosecutors alleged he withheld belongings to enforce compliance and even threatened to cut off a $10,000 rent payment if Jane did not follow his instructions.
Diddy’s attorneys pushed back, insisting all of the relationships involved consenting adults who made their own choices and that no commercial motive was present. They argued, “Mr. Combs, at most, engaged in voyeurism as part of a consensual ‘swingers’ lifestyle, which should not be classified as ‘prostitution’ under a narrowly defined interpretation of the statute.”
Although Diddy was cleared of the sex trafficking and racketeering counts, he was convicted on two charges of transportation for the purpose of prostitution. The final sentence will determine the consequences of those convictions, closing in on one of the most closely watched entertainment trials in recent memory.